Curriculum In Nursing Education and Philosophical Foundation of Education
Philosophical Foundations of the Curriculum In Nursing Education
Beautiful words. Admirable values. Published prominently on websites and in catalogues, student handbooks and accreditation reports. The philosophical statement of a school of nursing is accepted by faculty as a document that must be crafted to please external reviewers, but for many it remains little more than that.
Far
too often the school’s philosophy remains safely tucked inside a report but is
rarely seen as a living document that guides the day-to-day workings of the
school.
In reality, the philosophy of a school of nursing should be referenced and reflected upon often. It should be reviewed seriously with candidates for faculty positions and with those individuals who join the community as new members.
It should be discussed in a deliberate way
with potential students and with students as they progress throughout the
program. And it should be a strong guiding force as the school revises or
sharpens its goals, outlines action steps to implement its strategic plan, and
makes decisions about the allocation of resources.
This topic explores the significance of reflecting on, articulating, and being guided by a philosophy, examines the essential components of a philosophy for a school of nursing, and points out how philosophical statements guide the design and implementation of the curriculum and the evaluation of its effectiveness.
The role of faculty, administrators, and students in crafting and “living” the philosophy is discussed, and the issues and debates surrounding the “doing of philosophy” (Greene, 1973) are examined. Finally, suggestions are offered regarding how faculty might go about writing or revising the school’s philosophy.
What Is Philosophy Nursing Education and Curriculum Design
The educational philosopher Maxine Greene (1973) challenged educators to “do philosophy.” By this she meant that we need to take the risk of thinking about what we do when we teach and what we mean when we talk of enabling others to learn. It also means we need to become progressively more conscious of the choices and commitments we make in our professional lives.
Greene also challenged educators to look at our presuppositions, to examine critically the principles underlying what we think and what we say as educators, and to confront the individual within us. She acknowledged that we often have to ask and answer painful questions when we “do philosophy.”
In his seminal book, The Courage to Teach, Parker Palmer (2007) asserted that “though the academy claims to value multiple modes of knowing, it honors only one an ‘objective’ way of knowing that takes us into the ‘real’ world by taking us ‘out of ourselves’” (p. 18).
He encouraged educators to challenge this
culture by bringing a more human, personal perspective to the teaching learning
experience. Like Greene, Palmer suggested that, to do this, educators must look
inside so that we can understand that “we teach who we are” (p. xi) and so that
we can appreciate that such insight is critical for “authentic teaching,
learning, and living” (p. ix).
Philosophy, then, is a way of framing questions that have to do with what is presupposed, perceived, intuited, believed, and known. It is a way of contemplating, examining, or thinking about what is taken to be significant, valuable, or worthy of commitment.
Additionally, it is a way of becoming self aware and thinking of everyday experiences as opportunities to reflect, contemplate, and exercise our curiosity so that questions are posed about what we do and how we do it, usual practices are challenged and not merely accepted as “the way things are,” and positive change can occur.
Indeed, each of us as a fundamental
practice of being must go beyond the reality we confront, refuse to accept it
as a given and, instead, view life as a reality to be created.
These perspectives on “doing philosophy” focus primarily on individuals as human beings in general or as teachers in particular reflecting seriously on their beliefs and values. There is no question that such reflection is critical and is to be valued and encouraged.
However, “doing philosophy” must also be a group activity when one is involved in curriculum work. In crafting a statement of philosophy for a school of nursing, the beliefs and values of all faculty must be considered, addressed, and incorporated as much as possible.
In fact,
the very process of talking about one’s beliefs and values while it may
generate heated debates leads to a deeper understanding of what a group truly
accepts as guiding principles for all it does.
Philosophical Statements About Curriculum for Education In Nursing
A philosophy is essentially a narrative
statement of values or beliefs. It reflects broad principles or fundamental
“isms” that guide actions and decision making, and it expresses the assumptions
we make about people, situations, or goals. As noted by Bevis in her seminal
work (1989, p. 35), the philosophy “provides the value system for ordering
priorities and selecting from among various data.”
In writing a philosophical statement, we must
raise questions, contemplate ideas, examine what it is we truly believe, become
self aware, and probe what might be and what should be. It calls on us to think
critically and deeply, forge ideas and ideals, and become highly conscious of
the phenomena and events in the world.
We also must reflect on the mission, vision, and values of our parent institution and of our school itself, as well as on the values of our profession.
A mission statement describes unique purposes for which an institution or nursing unit exists: to improve the health of the surrounding community, to advance scientific understanding or contribute to the development of nursing science, to prepare responsible citizens, or to graduate individuals who will influence public policy to ensure access to quality health care for all.
A vision is an expression of what an institution or nursing unit wants to be: the institution of choice for highly qualified students wishing to make a positive difference in our world; the leader in integrating innovative technology in the preparation of nurses; or a center of synergy for teaching, research, professional practice, and public service.
Institutions and schools of
nursing often also articulate a set of values that guide their operation:
honesty and transparency, serving the public good, excellence, innovation, or
constantly being open to change and transformation.
As stated, a philosophy statement is the narrative that reflects and integrates concepts expressed in the mission, vision, and values of the institution or profession; it serves to guide the actions and decisions of those involved in the organization. Educational philosophy is a matter of “doing philosophy” with respect to the educational enterprise as it engages the educator.
It involves
becoming critically conscious of what is involved in the complex
teaching learning relationship and what education truly means. The following
statements about education, many by well-known individuals, provide examples of
different philosophical perspectives.
Philosophy as It Relates to Nursing Education As noted earlier, “doing philosophy” must move from individual work to group work when engaged in curriculum development, implementation, and evaluation. Faculty need to reflect on their own individual beliefs and values, share them with colleagues, affirm points of agreement, and discuss points of disagreement.
A discussion of
three basic educational ideologies is presented here to point out how
differences might arise if each person on a faculty were to approach education
from her or his own belief system only.
One basic educational ideology is that of romanticism (Jarvis, 1995). This perspective, which emerged in the 1960s, is highly learner centered and asserts that what comes from within the learner is most important. Within this ideological perspective, one would construct an educational environment that is permissive and freeing; promotes creativity and discovery; allows each student’s inner abilities to unfold and grow; and stresses the unique, the novel, and the personal.
Bradshaw asserted that “this ‘romantic’ educational
philosophy underpins current nurse education” (1998, p. 104); however, those
who acknowledge our current “content-laden curricula” in nursing (Diekelmann,
2002; Diekelmann & Smythe, 2004; Giddens & Brady, 2007; Tanner, 2010)
would disagree and posit that, although a “romantic” philosophy is embraced as
an ideal, it is not always evident in our day-to-day practices.
A second educational ideology, that of cultural transmission (Bernstein, 1975), is more society or culture centered. Here the emphasis is on transmitting bodies of information, rules, values, and the culturally given (i.e., the beliefs and practices that are central to our educational environments and our society in general).
One would expect an educational environment that is framed
within a cultural transmission perspective to be structured, rigid, and
controlled, with an emphasis on the common and the already established.
The third major educational ideology has been called progressivism (Dewey, 1944; Kohlberg & Mayer, 1972), where the focus is oriented toward the future and the goal of education is to nourish the learner’s natural interaction with the world.
Here the educational environment is designed to present resolvable but
genuine problems or conflicts that “force” learners to think so that they can
be effective later in life. The total development of learners not merely their
cognitive or intellectual abilities is emphasized and enhanced.
Increasingly, education experts agree that development must be an overarching paradigm of education, students must be central to the educational enterprise, and education must be designed to empower learners and help them fulfill their potentials.
Beliefs and values such as these surely would influence
expectations faculty express regarding students’ and their own performance, the
relationships between students and teachers, how the curriculum is designed and
implemented , and the kind of “evidence” that is gathered to
determine whether the curriculum has been successful and effective.
There
is no doubt that a statement of philosophy for a school of nursing must address
beliefs and values about education, teaching, and learning. However, it also
must address other concepts that are critical to the practice of nursing,
namely human beings, society and the environment, health, and the roles of
nurses themselves. These major concepts have been referred to as the
metaparadigm of nursing, a concept first introduced by Fawcett in 1984.
Give your opinion if have any.