Academic Performance In Nursing Education and Impacts of Clinical and Classroom Settings
Academic Performance in the Clinical and Classroom settings
One
major responsibility of nursing faculty is the evaluation of student academic
performance. In many circumstances faculty are charged with evaluating students
in both classroom (didactic) and clinical settings. Student evaluation is an
expectation of faculty at all levels and requires careful consideration for
many reasons.
The outcome of evaluation has a major effect on students, and faculty must always be aware of this. Faculty may have limited preparation in how to evaluate students within the classroom (Morrison, 2010) or the clinical setting (Suplee, Gardner, & Jerome D'Emilia , 2014).
The outcome of an evaluation usually means that students' progress in the program; However, an unsatisfactory evaluation means that students may face having to repeat a course, a delay in their education, or removal from the program. These outcomes have financial, emotional, and other costs for students.
In addition, faculty may also
experience negative consequences, such as emotional distress, pressure from
administration to maintain numbers, and a sense of personal failure when it is
necessary to assign a failing grade. In the context of this stressful situation
for all involved, faculty must be aware of the legal concepts important to the
evaluation process.
Academic Failure in the Clinical Setting In Nursing Education
Faculty who teach clinical nursing courses are responsible for guiding students in the development of professional nursing skills and values. Faculty must ensure that the learning experiences chosen provide the student with the opportunity to develop those skills that ensure that they will become safe, competent practitioners.
Applying a theoretical knowledge base, developing psychomotor skills, using appropriate communication techniques with patients and staff, exhibiting decision-making and organizational skills, and behaving in a professional manner are examples of the types of competencies that nursing students are expected to achieve through their clinical experiences.
Faculty are also expected to make judgments and decisions about the ability of students to satisfactorily meet the objectives of the clinical experience. When students are unable to satisfactorily meet the objectives of the clinical experience, faculty have the legal and ethical responsibility to deny academic progression.
Legal
and ethical grounds exist for dismissal of a student who is clinically
deficient. Nurse Practice Acts exist in all states to regulate nursing practice
and nursing education within a given state.
Successful graduation from a nursing program should indicate that the student has achieved the minimum competencies required for safe practice. When providing clinical care, nursing students will be held accountable for professionally negligent actions, and are required to come to clinical learning situations prepared and to ask for help when needed (Christensen, 2010).
Although nursing practice is regulated by state law, which results in variations in practice standards between states, the prevailing view is that students are practicing on their own “fictitious license” and not the license of their instructor (Christensen, 2010). As a result, students will be held to the same standards of practice as a reasonable, prudent nurse with the same education and experience.
Patients should expect that the care provided be safe, quality care at the level that is needed. In addition, students and faculty are expected to follow professional standards of practice and codes of ethics that have been developed to guide the profession, even though the students' educational experiences are not completed.
When engaged in clinical learning experiences, the nursing student is under the supervision of the clinical faculty, with input from agency staff. The nursing staff in the facility have ultimate control over patient care that is delivered, so there must be constant and appropriate communication between staff, faculty, and students.
The clinical agency contract that allows the school to use the facility for learning experiences may also contain a clause stipulating that the school of nursing will provide supervision of students.
It
is also common for the agency to retain the right to request removal of
students and faculty if the level of performance does not meet the standard of
care acceptable to the institution, and could result in the loss of the clinical
agency as a site for future clinical experiences.
Faculty must accept responsibility for ensuring that students practice with an acceptable level of competence. Each member of the health care team is liable for his or her own potential negligence related to patient care. If the student does not provide care according to applicable standards, the student is liable for any resulting damage.
If the nursing faculty does not adequately assign,
monitor, and supervise the student, the nursing faculty is liable for resulting
damage. And if the clinical staff who retain ultimate responsibility for the
patient's care neglect their duties in overseeing the care, they are liable for
resulting damage.
Clinical
faculty have several responsibilities related to the instruction of students.
First, clinical faculty must set clear expectations for student performance and
communicate these expectations to students before the onset of any learning
experience.
These expectations must be reasonable for students to meet and must be consistently and equitably applied to all of the faculty members' assigned students. Second, faculty must determine the amount of supervision to provide to students.
When
determining the appropriate level of supervision, faculty should consider the
severity and stability of the assigned patient's condition, the types of
treatments required by the patient, and the student's competence and ability to
adapt to changing situations in the clinical setting. Another responsibility of
clinical faculty is to judge the ability of the student to transfer classroom
knowledge to the clinical setting.
Application of theory to nursing care is an important component of safe nursing practice, and faculty must engage in data collection to determine the level of student performance in this area. Faculty may collect data in multiple ways. For example, before providing care, students may be asked to develop written care plans and provide the rationale for their proposed nursing interventions.
Faculty may also verbally ask students to explain the significance of patient
assessment data they have gathered, or students may be asked to keep a weekly
journal that provides insight into their clinical decision making.
Because faculty
retain the legal liability for appropriate student assignments and student
monitoring to ensure applicable standards of care are being followed, the
faculty has the responsibility to remove students from providing clinical
nursing care when the student is unsafe.
Fearing legal action, faculty may hesitate to fail a student who performs poorly in the clinical setting. However, federal and state courts have frequently upheld the responsibility and right of faculty to evaluate students' clinical performance and dismiss students who have failed to meet the criteria for a satisfactory performance.
The courts have long indicated that faculty, as experts in their profession, are best qualified to make decisions about the academic performance of students (Brent, 2001; Christensen, 2014; Guido, 1997; Smith, McKoy , & Richardson, 2001).
When teaching a clinical course, faculty must clearly
establish and communicate the course and clinical objectives; They must
document student performance and effectively communicate with students on an
ongoing basis about their progress in the clinical area.
As part of this communication, faculty should clearly identify at the beginning of the course, along with the clinical objectives, the level of clinical competence that students will be expected to achieve. These requirements should be stated in the course syllabus, along with information about how the clinical grade will be determined for the course.
The clinical syllabus should clearly
identify all of the evaluation measures that will be used in determining the
clinical grade. Students must receive continuing input through a formative evaluation
process, periodically receiving information about progress and suggestions for
improvement.
Students
must have time to demonstrate the course competency requirements during the
clinical experiences and cannot be required to master those competencies until
the end of the course. The consequences of not meeting objectives should also
be clearly communicated to students.
Written
records of all clinical experiences and student faculty conferences should be
kept for each student during the course. Hall (2013) studied the use of
anecdotal notes in the clinical setting and suggested that the use of anecdotal
notes can promote accurate student clinical evaluations.
Written
records of a student's learning experience documenting that the student has
been provided with adequate opportunity to meet the clinical objectives. If
opportunities to meet clinical objectives have not been provided, students
cannot be evaluated or failed on unmet objectives.
Anecdotal records should be objectively written, describe both positive and negative aspects of a student's performance, and address the objectives of the course. Faculty should avoid commenting on the personality of the student but instead should reflect on what the student has or has not accomplished in relation to the course objectives.
Notes of the student's daily and weekly assignments
should be based on fact and should be nonjudgmental. Documenting both aspects
of performance indicates that the student's total performance was taken into
account when the final clinical grade was assigned.
Throughout the clinical experience, faculty should provide consistent, constructive feedback to students. Identifying positive aspects of a student's clinical performance and areas needing improvement will help that student develop self-esteem and confidence as a practitioner.
Feedback is best conveyed in
privacy, away from peers, staff, and patients, thus maintaining student
confidentiality. Persistent clinical deficiencies should be addressed in
conferences with the student, ideally away from the clinical setting.
Written
records of student faculty conferences are used to document areas of faculty or
student concern that have been discussed, along with the measures that are
being taken to correct these deficiencies.
Information
about the progress the student makes toward correcting clinical deficiencies
and any lack of progress should be included in follow up notes. Both the
faculty member and the student should sign these written records.
Communicating effectively with a student who is not performing satisfactorily can be difficult. When feedback is given to a student about deficiencies in performance, it is essential for the faculty member to convey to the student a sense of genuine concern about helping the student to improve his or her performance, as well as to convey the faculty member's responsibility for ensuring patient safety in the clinical setting.
McGregor (2007) addressed the importance of the student faculty relationship in which faculty are supportive when helping students cope with a clinical failure while at the same time retaining a sense of their self-worth and dignity.
Students should be allowed
the opportunity to clarify and respond to the feedback given by the faculty member.
Sometimes an objective third party, such as a department chairperson or course
coordinator, can assist by providing an objective perspective of the
circumstances and serving as an impartial witness to what was said by both the
faculty member and the student.
When notifying a student that course requirements are not being met and failure of the course may result, the faculty member must follow the institutional guidelines that have been established for such situations. Informing a student of unsatisfactory clinical performance can produce a stressful situation for the student. However, it also provides the due process that is the student's right in cases of academic deficiency.
It enables the student to understand
that his or her performance is unsatisfactory and provides the student with the
opportunity to correct deficiencies. It is equally important that the faculty
member communicate information about the student's performance to other faculty
who are administratively responsible for the course.
Assisting the Failing Student in the Clinical Setting In Nursing Education
How do clinical faculty determine when a student's clinical performance is unsatisfactory and warrants failure of the course? How many opportunities should the student be given to learn before being evaluated? These are questions that have been debated in nursing education for decades without resolution.
Faculty are responsible for evaluating the cognitive, psychomotor,
and affective behaviors of students during clinical learning experiences. Even
with reliable and valid evaluation tools, it can be difficult to objectively
evaluate the behavior of students, especially in the affective domain.
Clinical
evaluation has many inherent challenges for the nurse educator. Clinical
evaluation may be subjective, evaluation criteria may be misinterpreted by
faculty or students, and clinical nursing practice is very complex (
Krautscheid , Moceri, Stragnell , Manthey, & Neal, 2014).
Faculty in the clinical setting need to implement clear clinical evaluation measures and provide the student with frequent feedback as to their progress in meeting the clinical expectations.
However, once having determined that a student's
performance is unsatisfactory and that failure of the course is likely to
occur, faculty must implement actions to protect the student's right to due
process and assist the student through what will undoubtedly be a stressful
experience.
Faculty
may use several guidelines when working with students whose clinical
performance is unsatisfactory. For example, as previously mentioned,
unsatisfactory clinical behaviors should be identified and discussed with the
student as early as possible.
Documentation of the student's performance and all conferences with the student should be maintained. Working in collaboration with the student, faculty should develop a plan or “learning contract” in which the needed areas of improvement are identified, along with appropriate measures to ensure improvement of performance.
The student should be made aware that isolated instances of good
or inadequate performance will not lead to a passing or failing grade. Instead,
it is essential that the student strive to develop a consistency of behavior
that portrays continuing improvement in performance and the delivery of safe
patient care.
The
student should also understand that successful completion of any remedial work
identified in the plan may not be sufficient to ensure a passing grade for the
course; satisfactory completion of the course objectives will be required.
After the plan has been detailed in a document, both the student and faculty
should sign and date it. The student should be given a copy of the plan for his
or her own records and reference.
Frequent
feedback sessions are essential during this time, as the student attempts to
make an improvement in performance. The number of sessions depends on the
situation, but it is often helpful to agree to meet on a regular basis, for
example, weekly. The faculty member should maintain objective and factual
records of all sessions held with the student, including a description of
strategies for intervention that were developed. Student self-appraisal should
be a part of the process.
The
student should also understand that during this period of evaluation, increased
supervision and observation by faculty may be necessary to continue to ensure
that patient safety is maintained. Then students may report feeling treated
unfairly or harassed and indicate that the increased faculty supervision is
creating a stressful situation.
It may be helpful at this time to refer the student to a counselor or other qualified individual for assistance with stress management. Then clinical faculty members should refrain from assuming the role of counselor to the student because a conflict of interest could develop that would interfere with the objective and unbiased judgment of the instructor.
Morgan (2001) cautioned that faculty, like counselors and therapists, have a responsibility to avoid assuming dual roles, such as counselor and faculty supervisor, when establishing relationships with students. It is imperative that the nurse educator only act within the boundaries of his or her position and role.
At
times, a clinical instructor may experience a sense of concern about a
student's performance but have difficulty clearly identifying the
unsatisfactory behaviors. The instructor may wish to seek input from another
faculty member about the student's performance.
Faculty
have the right, but no legal responsibility, to obtain an objective evaluation
by another faculty member. If this is done, the faculty member must make the
student aware of the purpose of this observation and that the results of the
objective evaluation may affect the grade awarded.
If the student continues to provide unsafe patient care despite the interventions to improve performance, faculty may withdraw the student from the course before the end of the semester.
Students who might qualify for removal from the clinical setting are those who demonstrate a consistent lack of understanding of their limitations, those who clearly and repeatedly cannot anticipate the consequences of their actions or lack of action, and those who consistently fail to maintain appropriate communication with faculty and staff about patient care.
If a student is dishonest with faculty and staff about the care provided
to a patient, serious, legal and ethical implications occur.
In
all of these cases, patient care may be jeopardized and unsafe situations may
be created for patients. Clinical faculty can refuse to allow a student to
continue to provide care in the clinical setting; however, if the student's
performance is safe, the student must be allowed to complete the clinical
requirements of the course, even if the student is not meeting course
objectives. Students are not required to achieve course objectives until the
end of the course.
Following the mentioned procedures helps ensure that a student's right to due process has been upheld. Maintaining effective communication with the student throughout the experience may be difficult but is essential to achieving a satisfactory resolution to the situation for both faculty and student.
When students
perceive that they have been treated fairly and objectively, most will accept
that they were unable to satisfactorily meet the objectives required of the
course. Faculty should avoid excessive self-blame for the clinical failure of a
student
Academic Failure in the Classroom Setting In Nursing Education
Nursing program curricula are by necessity academically rigorous. Academic classroom failure, with subsequent attrition from the nursing program, is not uncommon, and retention of nursing students is a familiar concern of nursing educators. However, faculty have a responsibility to uphold academic standards and must at times assign a failing grade in a course.
There are numerous reasons for academic failure in the classroom. First, students may initially underestimate the amount of time they will need to devote to course study to be successful in the pursuit of a nursing degree. Students may be unprepared and lack the study and time management skills necessary to organize their schedules and study time appropriately.
Students can quickly become overwhelmed with the academic demand
of a nursing program, and the resulting stress serves to further increase
anxiety and the inability to deal with course requirements.
Second, many of today's nursing students are attempting to fulfill numerous roles, simultaneously juggling the responsibilities and demands of work, family, and school. Role overload becomes excessive, and the students' grades are adversely affected. Students are often forced to make difficult decisions and may be ill-equipped to identify appropriate priorities when addressing these issues.
Third, some students have difficulty with the level of cognitive ability required in nursing courses. Although adept at memorizing facts and information, they are not able to apply the concepts and develop the appropriate decision-making abilities.
This is usually demonstrated by their
inability to perform well on tests that demand application, analysis, and
synthesis levels of cognition. Students who have never before been required to
think on these levels may become frustrated when they spend much time
memorizing information but still do not perform well on tests.
Some
students may have learning disabilities that affect their ability to read with
comprehension, successfully take tests, memorize information, or maintain
concentration. Some students have satisfactory clinical performance but are
unable to perform well in the classroom setting. Students for whom English is
a second language may also experience these difficulties.
Faculty have an ethical responsibility to identify students who are considered to be at high risk for academic failure in the classroom. The same examples of high-risk characteristics Donovan identified in 1989 are still pertinent today, and include low grade point average, low standardized test scores, decreased critical thinking skills, and attendance at several universities without achieving a degree.
An additional high risk characteristic is difficulty achieving satisfactory grades in required science courses (Wolkowitz & Kelley, 2010). When students who have these characteristics are accepted into a nursing program, academic support services must be provided to increase their chances of success.
Students who are working more than 16 hours a week and
those who have English as a second language have also been documented to be at
increased risk for lower academic performance ( Salamonson & Andrew, 2006).
Faculty also have the responsibility for developing and providing academic support services that increase students' chances for success and thus increase student retention in the nursing program.
There are many services that may be available to assist students academically, such as tutoring programs, individual course study sessions, study skills workshops, faculty student mentoring programs, test-taking support, peer study sessions, and time and stress management training. Faculty should be aware of resources within other departments in the institution that can offer valuable assistance to students in need.
They should
also encourage activities that provide a support system for students, such as
participation in student clubs and organizations. Peer mentoring can also be an
effective educational strategy that benefits both the student serving as the
mentor and the student being mentored (Dennison, 2010; Robinson & Niemer,
2010).
Developing
and providing support services for students with academic difficulties helps
ensure that students receive the assistance they need at the earliest possible
intervention point. Assisting the Failing Student in the Classroom
Setting for Clinical and Classroom for Academic Performance In Nursing Education
When designing intervention programs that will assist students to be academically successful in a nursing program, faculty must consider the academic experience from the perspective of the student because this may have major implications for student retention and success. Faculty should obtain feedback from students in the program about their areas of concern, both academic and nonacademic.
For
example, if students believe that large class size is interfering with their
ability to learn, strategies that provide students with access to faculty in
small groups could be implemented. Student focus groups can provide much
feedback, and faculty can use this information to develop interventions.
Faculty also need input about what programs or interventions are working (eg, tutoring services, orientation programs, peer-to-peer study assistance groups) so that these can be continued or eliminated according to their success. Faculty need to know what concerns students have that can be addressed with appropriate resources.
Using this information, faculty would be able to develop a retention intervention program designed to maximize students' positive experiences and enhance academic success. More specifically, faculty can implement several proactive strategies that support students' academic efforts in the classroom.
First, faculty should remain aware of the changing student population and
students' different learning styles. Nurse educators need to develop
innovative, flexible programs designed to support the academic needs of the
increasing numbers of nontraditional adult learners, graduate students, and
culturally diverse students.
Flexible
class scheduling, the use of technology to provide learning at convenient times
for students, campus child care , recognition of students' life experiences,
and support for students with English as a second language can all help
students achieve their educational goals.
The
learning expectations and strategies of today's college students are likely to
be different than those of students of the past. Much literature has been
published that addresses the varying learning styles of the current generation,
and information gained from those studies should be used to provide meaningful
learning experiences for students.
Students who are successfully integrated academically and socially into the academic environment will be more likely to be retained in the system. Institutions must realize that students bring diverse needs to the educational process.
The role
of the faculty adviser is key in assisting students to successfully adjust to
their academic responsibilities. Faculty need to be informed about academic
policies that affect student advice so that they are able to provide accurate,
timely information.
Academic
advising by faculty plays an essential role in the student's academic success
as well as in retention in nursing programs (Harrison, 2012). Rosenberg and
O'Rourke (2011) suggested that increasing the diversity and cultural competence
of the faculty can be used to improve student retention among students from
diverse backgrounds. Nursing associations or organizations can be a source of
encouragement for students and can serve as a vehicle for socializing students
into the nursing profession.
Individually, faculty members can take several steps to assist students who are doing poorly in the classroom. When a student demonstrates evidence of a lack of understanding of content of the course, such as failing a test or not completing an assignment properly, the faculty member should meet with the student to identify the student's perspective of the problem.
Students are often able to recognize the problem themselves, such as not enough time spent in preparation, lack of understanding of the material, or personal problems. Each of these reasons for poor performance requires the use of different intervention strategies, and the student should be involved in determining what actions are to be taken.
Tests should be reviewed to assess the areas of difficulty and to determine whether the problem is potentially related to, for example, lack of knowledge about content, reading difficulties, anxiety associated with test taking, poor study skills, or personal difficulties. Once the potential causes have been identified, intervention strategies can be designed and implemented to help correct the situation.
Faculty must realize that it is the student's responsibility to learn as well as the student's responsibility to use the resources available to improve academic performance. Students must take responsibility for carrying out the plan of action developed in conjunction with the faculty member.
Faculty cannot assume responsibility for ensuring that
all students are successful in the course, but they must make certain that
students are active participants in identifying concerns, developing strategies
to address deficiencies, and improving performance. Faculty should always be
willing to listen to student concerns and make referrals to appropriate program
resources when appropriate.
If, despite various efforts, a student cannot satisfactorily meet the course requirements, faculty have no alternative but to assign a failing grade. At this point, the student will require guidance and support as the available options are reviewed.
If this is the first nursing course that the student has
failed, it is commonly program policy to allow one retake of the course. If
this is the second nursing course failure for the student, the student may be
dismissed from the program. The student should receive appropriate academic
advice as he or she plans future educational goals.
Give your opinion if have any.